{"id":265,"date":"2012-04-27T02:35:38","date_gmt":"2012-04-27T02:35:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.clw54.com\/blog\/wordpress\/?p=265"},"modified":"2012-04-27T02:35:38","modified_gmt":"2012-04-27T02:35:38","slug":"why-these-results-are-what-they-are","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.clw54.com\/blog\/wordpress\/?p=265","title":{"rendered":"Why These Results Are What They Are&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Finally, a <a href=\"http:\/\/washingtonexaminer.com\/opinion\/columnists\/2012\/04\/lefts-righteous-mind\/521411\">study<\/a> I agree with, but the reason for the following results eluded the author, Conn Carroll.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>One-third of respondents were asked to fill out the questionnaire according to their own views. One-third were asked to fill it out as they thought a &#8220;typical liberal&#8221; would. And the last third were asked to fill out the survey as if they were a &#8220;typical conservative.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Haidt found that moderates and conservatives could accurately predict how liberals and conservatives would judge each statement. But liberals were far less capable of mirroring their ideological counterparts&#8217; thinking. Those describing themselves as &#8220;very liberal&#8221; did worst. Apparently, contra Krugman, the more liberal you are, the less able you are to understand other people&#8217;s beliefs.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>First of all, kudos to Mr. Carroll for writing this at all.\u00a0 The occasional study on comparative traits of libs and normal Americans (couldn&#8217;t resist) typically is designed to make conservatives look like racist neanderthals, which of course we aren&#8217;t.\u00a0 They&#8217;re intended to produce a desired political result.\u00a0 And I don&#8217;t mean to impugn Mr. Carroll for not including the following simple explanation.\u00a0 It would have taken his article off on a political tangent, which is my specialty.<\/p>\n<p>Now why do conservatives understand libs better than the other way around?\u00a0 Simple.\u00a0 It&#8217;s because conservatives are exposed to liberalism constantly in the news, newspaper, workplace, schools, damn near everywhere.\u00a0 Add to that the fact that liberals have gotten so far out, you can&#8217;t safely satirize them without giving them ideas.\u00a0 So you can pretty much put down anything ridiculous and it&#8217;s already happened somewhere.\u00a0 Just think of the last thing a lib did that made you go WTF and write it down.\u00a0 Like banning milk in daycare centers or baby cribs with sides that drop down.\u00a0 It&#8217;s hard to give a wrong answer.<\/p>\n<p>Liberals don&#8217;t understand conservatives because they get all their information from what other liberals say about conservatives, not what conservatives actually said or did.\u00a0 Ever hear a liberal comment on what a conservative said and try Googling it, only to find out it&#8217;s only on leftwing sites?\u00a0 All the time, right?\u00a0 The results would be more balanced if liberals watched <a href=\"http:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/\">Fox News<\/a> instead of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newshounds.us\/\">NewsHounds<\/a>.\u00a0 Or listened to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rushlimbaugh.com\/\">Rush Limbaugh<\/a> instead of browsing <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/\">Media Matters<\/a>.\u00a0 They don&#8217;t do any of that and they don&#8217;t get a dose of conservatism by osmosis, because it&#8217;s not out there.\u00a0 A liberal can live in a liberal echo chamber and still be part of society.\u00a0 Their success guarantees their ignorance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Finally, a study I agree with, but the reason for the following results eluded the author, Conn Carroll. One-third of respondents were asked to fill out the questionnaire according to their own views. One-third were asked to fill it out &hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.clw54.com\/blog\/wordpress\/?p=265\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-265","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-left"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.clw54.com\/blog\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.clw54.com\/blog\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.clw54.com\/blog\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.clw54.com\/blog\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.clw54.com\/blog\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=265"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"http:\/\/www.clw54.com\/blog\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":274,"href":"http:\/\/www.clw54.com\/blog\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/265\/revisions\/274"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.clw54.com\/blog\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.clw54.com\/blog\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.clw54.com\/blog\/wordpress\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}