The only reason I’m writing this is because hardly anybody reads this blog. If they did, I’d never give the left any more ideas than they can come up with on their own. But this one would certainly get them to rub their chins and go, “Hmmmmmm.” The idea is to eliminate weather.<\/p>\n
Obviously it’s not possible to eliminate weather, but it’s certainly possible to stop using the word. It’s still used everywhere. Radio, TV, newspapers, and websites. It’s what people think about when it rains, or if it’s hot, or if it’s cold. Meanwhile, the left calls it “climate change” and calls for treaties and carbon taxes.<\/p>\n
Well, the problem is that the masses aren’t calling it climate change. They’re still thinking about weather, and calling it weather. The left needs to halt this kind of insurgent talk, pronto. Like the list of things Hillary supporters tell us we can’t say, the left has to tell us we can’t call it weather anymore. The way to do this is to instruct radio, TV, newspapers, and websites that they are to call it “climate” from now on. They’ll capitulate, they always do. Think about it. The evening news\u00a0will have\u00a0the “Climate Report” at 5:18. The papers, what’s left of them,\u00a0will have the climate section near their left wing columnists. The radio can have traffic and\u00a0climate every ten minutes.<\/p>\n
Once everybody has their minds right, and the word “weather” slips into the seldom accessed recesses of our collective consciousness, bring out the pollsters. Poll people every time it rains or there’s a heat wave. Soon enough, 60% of the people will be calling for treaties and carbon taxes to get the climate back on track to 72 F and sunny skies.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The only reason I’m writing this is because hardly anybody reads this blog. If they did, I’d never give the left any more ideas than they can come up with on their own. But this one would certainly get them … Continue reading