I just tried to write a headline the mainstream media would approve of and feel like an idiot.  An idiot like whoever wrote this article on May 1st.  Not one mention of their involvement with Occupy Cleveland.  This is a common technique in the media.  If people who are part of a liberal media-approved group behave egregiously, just relabel them.  The same thing happened when Bill Clinton pardoned some Puerto Rican terrorists.  The next day, they were called nationalists or freedom fighters or something along those lines.  The media didn’t want to report a Democrat party president pardoned terrorists, so they just labeled them differently than the day before.

Supposedly, the assclowns who tried to blow up a bridge by texting it described themselves as “anarchists,” but the media isn’t ordinarily too willing to let people define themselves.  They needed an out and it was handed to them, so they went along with it.  So suddenly occupiers are anarchists.

If this seems perfectly legitimate, then just try reversing this in your minds.  Suppose some people met at a tea party rally and decided to blow up an abortion clinic.  And suppose the FBI stopped them.  How would it be reported?

Tea Party Tries to Blow up Women’s Health Center!